Try this for a starter:

Stökl Ben Ezra, Daniel. "Old Caves and Young Caves: A Statistical Reevaluation of a Qumran Consensus." Dead Sea Discoveries 14/3 (2007) 313-333.

You say that Golb's view has "been overtaken by subsequent study." 

The official Israel Antiquities Report by archaeologists Yitzhak Magen and Yuval Peleg, published in 2006 and now available on-line (see http://www.antiquities.org.il/images/shop/jsp/JSP6_Qumran_color.pdf) contains no such information, but simply endorses the Jerusalem theory without making the distinction betweer earlier and later scroll hidings that you describe.

So I'm a bit confused.  Perhaps you could provide a reference to published scientific data on these shrouds, or to some publication by the "scholars at the Hebrew University" to whom you refer, along with their names, so readers can verify this claim of yours?